数字人文研究 ›› 2024, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (3): 3-19.

• 游目骋观 •    下一篇

数字人文的使命完成了吗?——一项基于文献分析的考察

  

  1. 埃马努埃莱·萨勒诺(Emanuele Salerno),意大利国家研究委员会信息科技研究所资深研究员;陈龙(译者),中国社会科学院大学文学院副教授,中国社会科学院大学阐释学高等研究院研究员

  • 出版日期:2024-09-28 发布日期:2024-12-14
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“中国传统与欧陆思想的对话工具及其双向阐释” (22JJD720020)子课题阶段性成果

Digital Humanities: Mission Accomplished? An Analysis of Scholarly Literature


  • Online:2024-09-28 Published:2024-12-14

摘要:

数字人文领域的演变同计算机、软件和网络技术的演变以及相关学者的不同态度并行不悖。自其伊始,学者们就一直在争论数字人文可否被视为一门新的学科,以及能否算作一场革命。大约20年前,早期的“人文计算”演变为如今的数字人文,数字信息技术及其在人文学的应用状况发生了深刻变化。与此同时,专门的学术课程应运而生,从而为饱受争议的数字人文的学科性增添了理据。文章介绍了相关学术争论,区分了早期状况与最新动态,进而试图将此过程归入科学革命的模式。


关键词:

数字人文 , 人文计算 , 学术交流 , 技术 , 文学艺术

Abstract:

The field of digital humanities has evolved throughout the parallel evolution of computers, software and networking techniques, as well as the different attitudes of interested scholars. Since the earliest historical phases of this research field, scholars have been debating whether it can be considered as a new academic discipline and whether it is revolutionary in nature. About 20 years ago, the early denotation of “humanities computing” evolved to the present label of DH, and deep changes occurred in digital information technologies, as well as in their humanities applications. Meanwhile, dedicated academic curricula were launched, thus adding an argument in favor of the debated disciplinarity of digital humanities. This paper gives an account of the relevant scholarly debate, distinguishing between the early period and the most recent years; it then tries to frame this process in a model of scientific revolution.

Key words:

中图分类号: