数字人文研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1): 3-13.

• 游目骋观 •    下一篇

批判性再谈“数字人文

许喆,韩国釜山大学佔毕斋研究所研究员,鲁东大学区域国别学院特聘教授
  

  • 出版日期:2026-03-28 发布日期:2026-07-16

A Critical Reconsideration of Digital Humanities

  • Online:2026-03-28 Published:2026-07-16

摘要:

数字人文作为人文研究中的新兴领域,其学科属性迄今仍较为模糊,并伴随持续争议。文章从方法论视角出发,综合分析各国学者关于数字人文在克服传统人文研究局限方面的论述,并批判性地指出当前数字人文研究中“重数据建设、轻实质研究”的倾向。文章主张,数字人文本质上应被理解为人文研究的方法论,而非独立学科,并强调数据准确性、研究的科学性和论证逻辑的严密性。与此同时,文章批判了当前数字人文教育过分关注技术工具的使用,而忽视人文问题意识以及发现问题和解决问题能力的培养,因而有必要从“技术中心”转向“问题中心”和“批判思维”导向。

关键词:

 数字人文 , 方法论 , 学科建设 , 批判性思维 , ;数据准确性 , 研究范式

Abstract:

As an emerging field in humanities research, digital humanities remains a somewhat ambiguous discipline, accompanied by ongoing controversy.This article, from a methodological perspective, comprehensively analyzes the discussions by scholars from various countries regarding digital humanities' role in overcoming the limitations of traditional humanities research, and critically points out the current tendency in digital humanities research to "emphasize data construction while neglecting substantive research.The article argues that digital humanities should essentially be understood as a methodology for humanities research, rather than an independent discipline, and emphasizes data accuracy, the scientific rigor of research, and the strictness of logical argumentation.At the same time, the article criticizes current digital humanities education for its excessive focus on the use of technological tools while neglecting the cultivation of awareness of humanities issues and the ability to identify and solve problems.Therefore, it is necessary to shift from a "technology-centric" to a "problem-centric" and "critical thinking" orientation.

Key words: digital humanities , methodology , discipline construction , critical thinking , data accuracy , research paradigm

中图分类号: