数字人文研究 ›› 2023, Vol. 3 ›› Issue (3): 3-26.

• 批判思维 •    下一篇

数字历史与数字化政治

  

  1. 格本·扎格斯玛(Gerben Zaagsma),卢森堡大学当代与数字历史中心; 张晨文(译者),中国人民大学信息资源管理学院博士研究生
  • 出版日期:2023-09-28 发布日期:2024-11-13

Digital History and the Politics of Digitization


  • Online:2023-09-28 Published:2024-11-13

摘要:

近年来,已有研究学者对数字资源和历史数据在历史研究中的变革性潜力做了诸多介绍。历史学家被数字化史料和原生数字资料包围着,他们常常不假思索地加以应用,并对这些数字资源心怀感激。在一个日益重视网上资料的研究环境中,我们为什么、在哪里、如何获取我们可以获取的资料,以及这些资料如何影响历史研究,这些问题变得越来越紧迫。这篇文章提出了一个框架和一个模型,通过该框架可以了解(数字)遗产保存的政治背景,通过该模型可以利用数字人文、历史学、档案学、图书馆学和信息科学的文献,从最为重要的政治维度分析问题。文章第一部分将概述数字文化遗产政治的全球维度,重点关注全球南北之间及各自内部的发展,并将之置于更广泛的遗产政治及遗产保存的背景之下。第二部分阐述了数字化的历史和现状,并对数字化的进程及其政治内涵进行了结构化分析。数字化对象的选择、决定、编目、分类、元数据添加、数据获取,都具有政治性,并可产生政治后果。文章最后提出了一些建议,并呼吁人们认识到数字编目在获取全球人文资料中的重要作用。

关键词: 数字历史 , 数字化 , 文化遗产 , 遗产政治

Abstract:

Much has been made in recent years of the transformative potential of digital resources and historical data for historical research. Historians seem to be flooded with retro-digitized and born-digital materials and tend to take these for granted, grateful for the opportunities they afford. In a research environment that increasingly privileges what is available online, the questions of why, where, and how we can access what we can access, and how it affects historical research have become ever more urgent. This article proposes a framework through which to contextualize the politics of (digital) heritage preservation, and a model to analyze its most important political dimensions, drawing upon literature from the digital humanities and history as well as archival, library, and information science. The first part will outline the global dimensions of the politics of digital cultural heritage, focusing on developments between and within the Global North and South, framed within the broader context of the politics of heritage and its preservation. The second part surveys the history and current state of digitization and offers a structured analysis of the process of digitization and its political dimensions. Choices and decisions about selection for digitization, how to catalogue, classify, and what metadata to add are all political in nature and have political consequences, and the same is true for access. The article concludes with several recommendations and a plea to acknowledge the importance of digital cataloguing in enabling access to the global human record.

Key words:

中图分类号: