数字人文研究 ›› 2021, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (4): 3-10.

• •    下一篇

数字人文的方法理解及其反思

  

  1. 复旦大学生命医学伦理研究中心

  • 发布日期:2022-02-18
  • 基金资助:
    本文系国家社科基金重大项目“当代新兴增强技术前沿的人文主义哲学研究”(20&ZD045)阶段性成果。

Reflection on the Method of Digital Humanities  #br#

  • Published:2022-02-18

摘要:

数字人文领域出现的“实践先于理论”的态势使得“作为技术方法的数字人文”观点被广为接受,其本质是一种技术工具论的理解。尽管文学界提出“作为研究范式的数字人文”这一具有自我反思意识的观点,但尚显微弱,并且依然受技术工具论的束缚。因此,要将这种微弱的自我反思意识给予强化,从根本上还是要深入反思技术工具论的观念,指出被其遮蔽的诸多维度。数字人文的真正意义在于不仅使得人文研究的非文本的领域得以重新展现,并且有着将非人经验、数字对象等领域展开的可能性。

关键词: 数字人文;人的本质; 非人经验
font-size:medium,
">

Abstract: One view, digital humanities as technological method, has been accepted generally. Its nature is instrumental understanding. Although Literary field has reflected this view and put forward that digital humanities is a kind of research paradigm. It is so weak and limited by instrumental understanding. In order to strengthen the reflection, we must focus on instrumental understanding and point out the dimension covered. The meaning of digital humanities is not only to open the non-text field on humanities research, but also to make possible to discover the non-human experience, digital objects.

Key words: digital humanities, human nature, non-human experience

中图分类号: