数字人文研究 ›› 2025, Vol. 5 ›› Issue (3): 90-106.

• 人文新知 • 上一篇    下一篇

礼乐思想与天下有序:先秦国际体系内的战争与结盟社会网络分析

侯长坤,台湾大学政治学系博士
  

  • 出版日期:2025-09-28 发布日期:2025-11-05

The Thought of li and yue (礼乐) and “Ordered Tianxia”: A Social Network Analysis of War and Alliance in the Pre-Qin International System

  • Online:2025-09-28 Published:2025-11-05

摘要:

春秋战国时期的国际体系中有什么样特殊的国际秩序,使得弱肉强食、弱国无外交的现象与行为,在春秋战国时期并不彻底?从主流国际关系理论中霸权稳定、制衡成本角度出发,相关的研究并不能解释该时期的这一现象,另有特殊论视角的理论虽能解释,但存在不具普适性的问题。于此,研究借鉴了《礼记》中的礼乐(秩序和谐)思想,对天下主义理论进行建构,提出“天下有序”理论,作为天下主义的分支理论,用以解释上述特殊秩序存在的现象,同时在创建国际秩序方面,为当代主导国和有意成为主导的国家提供参考。研究认为,某些主导国家的行为具有礼乐思想,这种“礼”产生了“序”,从而形成有序的国际秩序。“礼”约束了国家行为体,以此大国会保护小国,小国会支持大国,大国与小国之间会相互尊重。研究在使用了社会网络分析方法,对先秦时期国际体系内战争与结盟网络进行分析、对齐桓晋文进行个案比较后,确定了“天下有序”现象在当时国际秩序中的存在且发挥作用。

关键词:

Abstract:

What kind of distinctive international order existed in the Spring and Autumn and Warring States periods that prevented the phenomenon and practice of “might makes right” and “small states having no diplomacy” from being carried out thoroughly? Mainstream international relations theories, such as hegemonic stability theory and balance-of-power cost arguments, fail to adequately explain this phenomenon in the Pre-Qin era. Alternative theories based on exceptionalism provide partial explanations but lack universality. In this context, this article draws on the Confucian thought of li and yue (propriety and harmony,礼乐) in the Liji to Construct a theoretical branch of Tianxiaism, namely the “Ordered Tianxia” theory, to explain the existence of this distinctive order. At the same time, the study offers implications for contemporary dominant powers and aspiring hegemons in building international order. It argues that certain hegemonic behaviors reflect the ideas of li and yue: propriety and harmony generate order, thereby forming an ordered international system. Li Constrains the behavior of states such that great powers protect small states, small states support great powers, and both respect one another. Methodologically, this research applies social network analysis to examine the war and alliance networks of the Pre-Qin international system and conducts case comparisons of Duke Huan of Qi and Duke Wen of Jin. The findings Confirm that the phenomenon of “Ordered Tianxia” did exist and functioned in shaping the international order of that era.

Key words:

中图分类号: