数字人文研究 ›› 2026, Vol. 6 ›› Issue (1): 14-30.

• 游目骋观 • 上一篇    下一篇

叙事责任与人工智能——AI如何挑战人类的责任与意义理解

马克·科克尔伯格(Mark Coeckelbergh),维也纳大学哲学系教授;易瑶琴(译者),云南大学马克思主义学院硕士研究生;杨璇(译者),云南大学讲师
  

  • 出版日期:2026-03-28 发布日期:2026-07-16
  • 基金资助:
    云南省教育厅科学研究基金项目“当代西方左翼共产主义思潮发展动向研究”(KC252512248)资助;云南大学第九届科研创新项目“霍耐特承认理论视域下零工经济中的过渡劳动研究”(2025-YNUMY-10)资助

Narrative Responsibility and Artificial Intelligence: How AI Challenges Human Responsibility and Sense-Making

PDF (PC)

3

摘要：

多数责任论述聚焦于一种责任，即道德责任，或对道德责任的特定方面展开探讨，如能动性。文章概述了一个更广泛的责任思考框架，涵盖因果责任、关系责任，以及作者称之的“叙事责任”——作为“诠释责任”的一种形式，并将这些责任概念与不同类型的知识、学科和关于人的存在的观点相联系，阐释此框架如何有助于绘制和分析人工智能以各种方式挑战人类的责任和意义构建。文章借助最新的诠释学方法研究技术，提出除了道德责任等类型的责任外，人类还承担着叙事责任和诠释责任——一般而言，也包括对技术的责任。例如，人类的任务是了解并运用人工智能，在必要时对其加以约束。虽然从后人类主义的角度来看，技术有助于意义构建，但人类是体验者和责任承担者，在涉及此类诠释责任时，人类始终占据主导地位。面对一个充满数据要素、相关性和概率的世界，注定要去做出合理解释。此外，这一工作还涉及规范层面，有时甚至是政治层面：倘若人类希望避免自己的故事被他人借助技术手段改写，那么承认并履行诠释责任尤为重要。

关键词: 责任 , 叙事责任 , 诠释责任 , 人工智能 , 诠释学 , 技术哲学

Abstract:

Most accounts of responsibility focus on one type of responsibility, moral responsibility, or address one particular aspect of moral responsibility such as agency.This article outlines a broader framework to think about responsibility that includes causal responsibility, relational responsibility, and what I call“narrative responsibility”as a form of“hermeneutic responsibility”,connects these notions of responsibility with different kinds of knowledge, disciplines, and perspectives on human being, and shows how this framework is helpful for mapping and analysing how artificial intelligence(AI)challenges human responsibility and sense-making in various ways.Mobilizing recent hermeneutic approaches to technology, the article argues that next to, and interwoven with, other types of responsibility such as moral responsibility, we also have narrative and hermeneutic responsibility—in general and for technology.For example, it is our task as humans to make sense of, with and, if necessary, against AI.While from a posthumanist point of view, technologies also contribute to sense-making, humans are the experiencers and bearers of responsibility and always remain in charge when it comes to this hermeneutic responsibility.Facing and working with a world of data, correlations, and probabilities, we are nevertheless condemned to make sense.Moreover, this also has a normative, sometimes even political aspect: acknowledging and embracing our hermeneutic responsibility is important if we want to avoid that our stories are written elsewhere—through technology.

Key words: responsibility , narrative responsibility , hermeneutic responsibility , artificial intelligence , hermeneutics , philosophy of technology

中图分类号: 

版权所有 © 《数字人文研究》编辑部
地址：中国人民大学数字人文研究中心《数字人文研究》编辑部　邮编：100872　
电话：010-62511463　
技术支持：北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司